Выделить слова: 

Патент США №

10736121

Автор(ы)

Grabowsky и др.

Дата выдачи

04 августа 2020 г.

Dynamic transmission control for a wireless network



РЕФЕРАТ

In one possible embodiment, a wireless network with dynamic transmission control is provided that includes a multiple of nodes. The nodes include an arbiter and multiple client nodes. The arbiter is configured to control an operation of the client nodes by defining communications operation cycles and allocating a bandwidth to each of the client nodes on a cycle by cycle basis in response to requests for bandwidth from the client nodes.

Авторы:

John F. Grabowsky (Camarillo, CA), Phillip T. Tokumaru (Thousand Oaks, CA), Robert J. Kniskern (Fort Wayne, IN), Nicholas S. Currens (Lima, OH), Allan L. Levine (Thousand Oaks, CA)

Патентообладатель:
ИмяГородШтатСтранаТип

AeroVironment, Inc.
Simi Valley
CA
US

Заявитель:

AeroVironment, Inc. (Simi Valley, CA)

ID семейства патентов

43731090

Номер заявки:

14/702,445

Дата регистрации:

01 мая 2015 г.
Prior Publication Data
Document IdentifierPublication Date
US 20150319769 A1Nov 5, 2015

Отсылочные патентные документы США

Application NumberFiling DatePatent NumberIssue Date
12878989Sep 9, 20109084276
61241854Sep 11, 2009

Класс патентной классификации США:

1/1

Класс совместной патентной классификации:

H04W 72/087 (20130101); H04W 72/1236 (20130101); H04W 72/0446 (20130101); H04B 7/18504 (20130101); H04L 67/12 (20130101); H04W 28/20 (20130101)

Класс международной патентной классификации (МПК):

H04W 72/08 (20090101); H04W 72/04 (20090101); H04W 72/12 (20090101); H04B 7/185 (20060101); H04L 29/08 (20060101); H04W 28/20 (20090101)

Использованные источники

[Referenced By]

Патентные документы США

4117267September 1978Haberle et al.
5598416January 1997Yamada et al.
5864560January 1999Li
6226572May 2001Tojima et al.
6272325August 2001Wiedeman et al.
6282206August 2001Hindus et al.
6480506November 2002Gubbi
7039367May 2006Kucik
7062250June 2006Kosaka
7313409December 2007Iacono et al.
7412517August 2008Jorgensen
7526303April 2009Chary
7581702September 2009Olson et al.
9084276July 2015Grabowsky et al.
2002/0052956May 2002Seibold et al.
2003/0164794September 2003Haynes
2004/0109428June 2004Krishnamurthy
2005/0002362January 2005Kim et al.
2005/0078672April 2005Caliskan et al.
2005/0262216November 2005Kashiwabara et al.
2006/0009262January 2006Hamm
2006/0019610January 2006Ue et al.
2006/0061506March 2006Murphy
2006/0120433June 2006Baker et al.
2007/0019569January 2007Park, II et al.
2007/0160055July 2007Takahashi
2007/0053308August 2007DuMas et al.
2008/0007447January 2008Vincent
2008/0027591January 2008Lenser et al.
2008/0069029March 2008Chow
2008/0112370May 2008Kwon
2008/0263628October 2008Norman et al.
2008/0268855October 2008Hanuni
2009/0154407June 2009Jeong et al.
2009/0164638June 2009Jang et al.
2009/0238096September 2009DuMas et al.

Зарубежные патентные документы

101267612Sep 2008CN
1458141Sep 2004EP
2073414Jun 2009EP
2094047Aug 2009EP
2000049738Feb 2000JP
2003-032739Jan 2003JP
2003309506Oct 2003JP
2004-336408Nov 2004JP
2006-526932Nov 2004JP
2004-343759Dec 2004JP
2006-333360Dec 2006JP
2007189464Jul 2007JP
2008-148039Jun 2008JP
2009-033678Feb 2009JP
2011044917Mar 2011JP
2004-109996Dec 2004WO
2007/034428Mar 2007WO
2008-016846Feb 2008WO
2009/029608Mar 2009WO

Другие источники


Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) Search Report (Search_Rpt) and Written Opinion (WO) dated Apr. 17, 2014 for corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 201203958-2 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., Hungarian Patent Office; 13 pgs. cited by applicant .
Response to Intellectual Property Office of Singapore Written Opinion (IPOS_R-WO) dated Apr. 17, Apr. 2014 filed Nov. 10, 2014 for corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 201203958-2 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Hungarian Patent Office; 17 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Office Action (OA) for corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 99130704 dated Jan. 28, 2014 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 4 pgs. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of First Office Action (OA1) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Jul. 29, 2014 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; 8 pgs. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of Search Report (Search_Rpt) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Jul. 21, 2014 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; 2 pgs. cited by applicant .
Australian Government IP Australia (AU) Patent Examination Report (Exam_Rpt) for for corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2010292009 dated Sep. 11, 2014 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Australian Government IP Australia; 3 pgs. cited by applicant .
International Searching Authority; Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Search Report (ISR) for corresponding PCT case Application No. PCT/US2010/048539 dated May 30, 2011 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Korean Intellectual Property Office; 3 pgs. cited by applicant .
International Searching Authority; Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Written Opinion (WO) for corresponding PCT case Application No. PCT/US2010/048539 dated May 30, 2011 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Korean Intellectual Property Office; 5 pgs. cited by applicant .
Japan Patent Office (JPO) machine translation of Office Action (OA) for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-528952 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Feb. 6, 2014 from Japan Patent Office; 3 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Search Report (Search_Rpt) for corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 99130704 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Jan. 24, 2014 from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 1 pg. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of First Office Action (OA2) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Jun. 8, 2015 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; 4 pgs. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of Fifth Office Action (OA5) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Sep. 5, 2017 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; 3 pgs. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of Search Report (Srch_Rpt) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Sep. 5, 2017 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from The State Intellectual Property Office of The People's Republic of China; 2 pgs. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of Third Office Action (OA3) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Feb. 19, 2016 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; 4 pgs. cited by applicant .
Korea Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) English translation of First Office Action (OA1) for corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7009413 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Apr. 21, 2016 from Korean Intellectual Property Office; 7 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Office Action (OA1) for corresponding Divisional Taiwan Patent Application No. 104106303 dated May 20, 2016 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 7 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Search Report (Search_Rpt) for corresponding Divisional Taiwan Patent Application No. 104106303 dated May 19, 2016 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 1 pg. cited by applicant .
Japan Patent Office (JPO) English translation of First Office Action (OA1) for corresponding Divisional Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-021086 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Jun. 14, 2016 from Japan Patent Office; 3 pgs. cited by applicant .
European Patent Office (EPO) extended European Search Report (eESR) for corresponding Patent Application No. EP 10 81 6208 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Sep. 15, 2016 from European Patent Office; 9 pgs. cited by applicant .
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) First Office Action (OA1) and Search Report (Search_Rpt) for corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2 784 255 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Oct. 3, 2016 from Canadian Property Office; 5 pgs. cited by applicant .
Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) Examination Report (Exam_Rpt) dated Aug. 31, 2016 for corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 201203958-2 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Intellectual Property Office of Singapore; 7 pgs. cited by applicant .
The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO) English translation of Fourth Office Action (OA4) for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201080051392.4 dated Jan. 5, 2017 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; 10 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Second Office Action (2OA) for corresponding Taiwan Divisional Patent Application No. 106103471 dated Dec. 19, 2018 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 8 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Search Report (Srch_Rpt) for corresponding Taiwan Divisional Patent Application No. 106103471 dated Dec. 10, 2018 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 1 pg. cited by applicant .
Japan Patent Office (JPO) English translation of First Office Action (1OA) for corresponding Japanese Divisional Patent Application No. 2018-89489 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Feb. 26, 2019 from Japan Patent Office; 5 pgs. cited by applicant .
Canada Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) Third Office Action (3OA) and Search Report (Search_Rpt) for corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,784,255 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless getwork by Grabowsky et al.; dated Mar. 26, 2019 from Canada Intellectual Property Office; 5 pgs. cited by applicant .
European Patent Office (EPO) extended European Search Report (eESR) for corresponding European Patent Application No. 18 186 519.7 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Nov. 16, 2018 from European Patent Office; 9 pgs. cited by applicant .
Intellectual Property India (IPI) First Examination Report (FER) for corresponding Indian Patent Application No. 858/KOLNP/2012 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Apr. 16, 2019 from Intellectual Property India; 8 pgs. cited by applicant .
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) Second Office Action (OA2) and Search Report for corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,784,255 dated Apr. 19, 2018 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Canadian Intellectual Property Office; 5 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Office Action (OA1) and Search Report (Srch_Rpt) for corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 106103471 dated Mar. 7, 2018 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 9 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Search Report (Srch_Rpt) for corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 106103471 dated Feb. 28, 2018 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 1 pg. cited by applicant .
Japan Patent Office (JPO) English translation of Second Office Action (OA2) for corresponding Divisional Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-021086 Entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Jun. 20, 2017 from Japan Patent Office; 4 pgs. cited by applicant .
Korea Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) English translation of First Office Action (OA1) for corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2019-7008140 entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al.; dated Jul. 9, 2019 from Korean Intellectual Property Office; 2 pgs. cited by applicant .
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) English translation of Third Office Action (3OA) for corresponding Taiwan Divisional Patent Application No. 106103471 dated Jul. 25, 2019 entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office; 4 pgs. cited by applicant .
Australian Government, IP Australia (AUIP); Examiner's Report (Exam_Rpt) for corresponding Australian case application No. 2018203707 entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., dated Aug. 2, 2019 from the Australian Government, IP Australia; 3 pgs. cited by applicant .
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO); Examination Report (Exam_Rpt) for corresponding Canadian case application No. 2,784,255, entitled Dynamic Transmission Control for a Wireless Network by Grabowsky et al., dated Mar. 13, 2020 from Canadian Intellectual Property Office, 5 pgs. cited by applicant.

Главный эксперт: Jain; Ankur
Уполномоченный, доверенный или фирма: Balzan; Christopher R. Aagaard; Eric J.

Текст решения-прецедента



CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/878,989, by Grabowsky et al., entitled DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION CONTROL FOR A WIRELESS NETWORK, filed Sep. 9, 2010, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/241,854, filed on Sep. 11, 2009, by Grabowsky et al., entitled DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION CONTROL FOR A WIRELESS NETWORK, both herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.

ФОРМУЛА ИЗОБРЕТЕНИЯ



What is claimed is:

1. A method for communicating on a wireless network having a plurality of nodes, the method comprising: selecting a node to function as an arbiter for controlling communication of at least one non-arbiter node of the plurality of nodes on the wireless network; receiving at the arbiter requests for a desired bandwidth from the at least one non-arbiter node; adjusting dynamically the bandwidth allocated to the at least one non-arbiter node based on the requests, comprising using the arbiter to define operation cycles and assign a transmission start time and duration for each cycle to the at least one non-arbiter node; and relaying unmanned aerial vehicle airborne flight control commands between at least two non-arbiter nodes via the arbiter so as to pilot one of the at least two non-arbiter nodes using another of the at least two non-arbiter nodes via the arbiter, wherein the one of the at least two non-arbiter nodes is an unmanned aircraft.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting a node comprises selecting one of: (a) a ground unit; (b) an unmanned vehicle; or (c) a manned vehicle.

3. The method of claim 2, and wherein selecting a node comprises selecting an unmanned vehicle as the arbiter.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting a node to function as an arbiter comprises powering up a node and monitoring for an existing DDL session and assuming the role of arbiter if no DDL session is in progress.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein monitoring for an existing DDL session comprises monitoring within a channel, and wherein assuming the role of arbiter comprises initiating a DDL session within the channel if no DDL session is detected within the channel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving requests comprises receiving an initial request for the desired bandwidth allocation from a non-arbiter node and granting bandwidth allocation in response to the initial request to allow the requesting non-arbiter node to join a DDL session.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the arbiter is an unmanned vehicle and the non-arbiter node is a ground unit, and further comprising receiving vehicle control commands for the unmanned vehicle from the non-arbiter node and maneuvering the arbiter according to the vehicle control commands from the non-arbiter node.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the arbiter is a first unmanned vehicle and the non-arbiter node is a ground unit, and further comprising receiving vehicle control commands for a second unmanned vehicle from the non-arbiter node and passing the vehicle control commands to the second unmanned vehicle.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting a node to function as an arbiter comprises transferring duties of the arbiter to a non-arbiter node to provide a new arbiter for a DDL session.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein transferring the duties to the new arbiter is in response to a request from the non-arbiter node.

11. The method of claim 10 further comprises relaying data between the at least two non-arbiter nodes comprising at least one of: (a) mission information; (b) video, (c) other sensor or sensor derived data; (d) voice; or (e) instant messaging.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein adjusting the bandwidth further comprising prioritizing the data for relaying and controlling the flow of the data based on a priority of the data.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein adjusting the bandwidth further comprising prioritizing requests for bandwidth and allocating bandwidth in an operation cycle based on a priority of the data.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the bandwidth further comprising prioritizing requests for bandwidth and allocating bandwidth in an operation cycle based on a priority of each request.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the bandwidth comprises using the arbiter to define the operation cycles comprising dividing the operation cycles into a set of time segments and assigning to the at least one non-arbiter node in the wireless network a starting time segment and a number of time segments.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one non-arbiter node comprises multiple non-arbiter nodes such that selecting comprises selecting a node to function as an arbiter for controlling communication on the wireless network of the multiple non-arbiter nodes, and receiving comprises receiving at the arbiter requests for a desired bandwidth from the multiple non-arbiter nodes, and adjusting comprises adjusting dynamically the bandwidth allocated to the multiple non-arbiter nodes based on the requests, comprising using the arbiter to define operation cycles and assign a transmission start time and duration to each cycle of each of the multiple non-arbiter nodes.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein relaying vehicle flight control commands between at least two non-arbiter nodes comprising controlling one non-arbiter node with another non-arbiter node.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein controlling one non-arbiter node with another non-arbiter node comprises controlling an unmanned vehicle.


ОПИСАНИЕ




УРОВЕНЬ ТЕХНИКИ



Small Unmanned Vehicle Systems, such as UAVs, can accomplish their missions using Digital Data Link (DDL) communications. For example, an unmanned aerial vehicle or UAV transmits via the DDL a large amount of data (video) to a ground controller, with a small amount of data being transmitted to the UAV. Since the unmanned vehicles are typically power constrained, the bulk of the DDL data, video data from the UAV, is transmitted by the power constrained UAV.

Moreover, it is critical that many of the DDL signals be real time. To control a remotely piloted vehicle, the operator receives, views, and mentally processes real time video, and then physically responds, i.e. moves a control stick, to transmit control signals to the vehicle, which are acted upon by the vehicle. It requires full motion real time data in both directions.

Traditional systems, WiMax, cellular phone, are optimized without regard to power constraints, and without regard to critical timing constraints based on the nature of the information within the signal. With traditional systems, for high quality video, time is not critical, so it is typically buffered, to take advantage of time gaps. In a UAV, such buffering is not possible due to the critical nature of the response to the video signal. With packet voice or video telephony, the data is heavily compressed, with lower data rates, and not full motion high quality real time data. With UAVs, however, the data needs to be transmitted to the operator quickly, when ready, and not buffered for when it is convenient for the medium or the protocol.

In addition, for UAVs, the DDL must satisfy a number of operational scenarios not present in traditional system.

What is needed are planned DDL services and features that enable aircraft and ground devices to fulfill their missions.


СУЩНОСТЬ



In one possible embodiment, a wireless network with dynamic transmission control is provided that includes a multiple of nodes. The nodes include an arbiter and multiple client nodes. The arbiter is configured to control operation of the client nodes by defining communications operation cycles and allocating bandwidth to each of the client nodes on a cycle by cycle basis in response to requests for bandwidth from the client nodes.


КРАТКОЕ ОПИСАНИЕ РИСУНКОВ



The features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example DDL environment.

FIG. 2 illustrates a network architecture and the protocol layers.

FIGS. 3A and 3B show block diagrams of node addressing for a sample DDL session, from the perspective of a laptop connected to a ground control station.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show a block diagram showing transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over a mission lifetime for one aircraft being controlled by one ground control station.

FIGS. 5A and 5B is a block diagram illustrating transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over a mission lifetime for an example video relay scenario.

FIGS. 6A and 6B is a block diagram illustrating transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over a portion of a mission for an example video relay scenario.

DESCRIPTION

In various embodiments, a wireless network has multiple nodes (transmitters/receivers controlled by an operating system) where one of the nodes functions as an arbiter to control operation of the other nodes. The arbiter defines operation cycles which are each divided up into a set of time segments. The arbiter also assigns to each node in the network a transmission start time (a time segment) and transmission duration for each cycle (number of time segments). The transmission start time and the duration can be changed for each node and for each cycle (thus dynamic) by the arbiter. The nodes can be ground control stations GCUs, unmanned vehicles, such as unmanned aerial vehicles or UAVs, or the like. In some embodiments, the ground station may operate as the arbiter and the UAVs will be the nodes being given varying transmission times. Since small UAVs require very scarce radio spectrum, this allows the allocated radio spectrum to be efficiently shared by multiple nodes (potentially multiple UAVs and ground systems) by adjusting the bandwidth allocated to each node depending on the instantaneous demand by the node as well as the need of the operator. This allows the operator to control whether each UAV either, transmits full video, transmit degraded video or still pictures, or does not transmit any imagery, maximizing the bandwidth available for the most desired transmission purpose, and reducing the bandwidth for the less desired purposes.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example DDL environment 10. In one DDL session 15 in a frequency band x, the DDL environment 10 incorporates unmanned vehicles UAV1 and UAV2, such as aerial vehicles, each containing a DDL node 100 and 300, respectively. The DDL environment 10 may further incorporate manned ground stations GCU1 and GCU2, each containing a DDL node 200 and 400, respectively. Handheld controllers 205 and 405 connected to GCU1 and GCU2, respectively, are used by the operator (not shown) to generate control signals for UAV1 or UAV2. Optionally, the DDL environment 10 may also incorporate external devices 210 and 410, such as laptops, physically connected to a DDL node 200 and 400, respectively, such as via Ethernet connections 215 and 415. Moreover, one or more optional remote viewing terminal(s) RVT containing a DDL node 500 may be included. The remote viewing terminal(s) and/or ground stations may optionally contain push-to-talk or PTT voice communications capability (not illustrated) in FIG. 1. In addition to the DDL session 15, other DDL sessions 25, operating in other operating frequency bands, also may be present in the DDL environment 10.

The DDL environment 10 and associated architecture show in FIG. 1 is for illustration purposes and allows multiple devices, components, or items of the various types discussed above, or other device or item types. Furthermore, several of the devices, components, or items may be combined or omitted as desired. For example, the ground station GCU1 and the handheld controller 205 may be combined into a single device. Or, for example the external device 210 may be omitted, or may be a device other than a laptop computer device.

The DDL system may contain various functional and design constraints, depending on the embodiment. In various embodiments, the DDL system should provide some or all of the following functions: DDL Nodes should be able to address each other. Laptops (or Hand Controllers) should be able to address their local DDL Node. This is the node within the ground station that the laptop plugs into. Laptops (or Hand Controllers) should be able to address all DDL Nodes (not just the local DDL Node). Laptops should be able to address other Laptops (which are plugged in to other DDL Nodes). The DDL LAN should support a router connected to a local DDL Node and also to a Wide-Area-Network to provide connectivity between the two. Moreover, in various embodiments, the DDL system design my conform to some or all of the following constraints: The Hand Controller is optional. The local DDL Node should be capable of connecting to a DDL network without a Hand Controller. The Laptop is optional. The local DDL Node should be capable of connecting to a DDL network without a Laptop. Operator setup should not be required. Basic DDL scenarios can be satisfied without requiring an Operator to pre-configure DDL Nodes. Advanced scenarios may require minimal Operator setup. Non-standard laptop software should not be required. Normal operating system software is sufficient to connect a Laptop to the DDL network. Controlling aircraft requires special software. Introduction of DDL Nodes or attachment of external devices should not cause service disruptions.

Example DDL Scenarios

The list of example scenarios in Table 1 below represent the various missions, and portions of missions, for which DDL may operate, in various UAV embodiments. Other embodiments and scenarios are possible. The scenarios that are portions of missions can occur as part of multiple other missions. For example, the GCS Handoff Scenario may occur during the mission represented by the Classic Scenario, in which case both scenarios impose requirements on the DDL design.

As shown in Table 1, there are multiple scenarios envisioned for operating a DDL network. Some scenarios comprise an entire mission, and other scenarios consist of one portion of a mission. Some scenarios can be components of many missions. The following list in Table 1 is a collection of scenarios that elucidate features applicable to a DDL network design.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Importance Name Scenario Description VBW Split GCS AC EXT BW Cfg HIGH Classic Traditional scenario - one pilot controls 1 1 1 Auto one aircraft. BW is devoted to direct aircraft video to ground leg. HIGH Autonomous Aircraft commanded to continue 1 0 1 Auto Continuation mission without continuous control. HIGH GCU Hand- Aircraft mission continues during 1 2 1 Auto Off handoff from one GCU to another. HIGH Shared Video Traditional scenario, plus multiple 1 1 1 9 Auto with Push- RVTs that have PTT voice party line. To-Talk HIGH Video Relay Pilot launches relay aircraft which 2 1 2 Auto orbits autonomously, then launches and flies sensor aircraft. BW is split between sensor to relay leg, and relay to ground leg. MEDIUM Multiple Pilot 1 controls aircraft 1, and Pilot 2 3 2 2 Auto Pairs controls aircraft 2, on same channel. BW is split between both aircraft video and relay to ground leg. MEDIUM Data Relay - Pilot launches relay aircraft which 0 1 1 9 Opr Small orbits autonomously, relay devoted to relaying data between external clients. (See Comm Relay - Large) MEDIUM Relay Relief Launch relief aircraft to take over as 1 3 Opr relay and as Arbiter upon battery low. MEDIUM Ground Pilot launches relay aircraft, then 3 1 1 2 Tech Robot another driver controls robot via relay. BW is split between robot video to relay, and relay to ground, and aircraft video to ground. MEDIUM Swarm Swarm of aircraft fly around single 4 1 1 2 Opr GCU, within direct downlink range (no relay). GCU surfs the video streams. LOW Data Relay - Pilot launches relay aircraft which 0 1 1 100 Tech Large orbits autonomously, relay devoted to relaying data between external clients. LOW Multi-Hop Aircraft relay chain beyond direct 3+ 1 3+ Tech Relay range of first relay. LOW Peer-Peer Nodes that can hear each other directly, 0 Tech Direct suppress the Arbiter rebroadcast. LOW Mesh No Arbiter. Nodes repeat any packet 9 1 9 0 Tech they hear, decrementing the Time-To- Live count to zero.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1 KEY VBW Split Denotes how many video stream bandwidths need to be accommodated. Direct aircraft to ground would be a split of 1, relay would be a split of 2, relay from distant aircraft plus direct from near aircraft would be 3. GCS Number of Ground Stations (GCUs) transmitting to control aircraft. AC Number of Aircraft transmitting video and TM. EXT Number of External data devices, each requiring a ground station for transmitting. BW Cfg Auto = BW allocation fully automatically ("Split among controlled aircraft") Opr = BW allocation per high-level operator policy ("Split" or "Focus-On-One") Tech = BW allocation specified quantitatively, in detail, by technician

Network Protocol Layers

Network architectures are comprised of a number of protocol layers as shown in FIG. 2. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the DDL network can be viewed as a vertical stack from the lowest physical layer up to the standard network layer. The layers are:

Network Layer--

The highest layer transfers Ethernet packets between external devices connected to DDL nodes. Packets have MAC addresses which are used by the external devices to communicate with each other. Normal internet traffic enters the DDL network via one edge DDL node, and exits from all other edge DDL nodes, providing a channel for those external devices to communicate with each other. In the network layer, external devices communicate with other external devices.

Link Layer--

This middle layer transfers DDL packets between DDL nodes. These packets have DDL addresses, consisting of a DDL RUID (Random Unit Identifier), sometimes alternatively referred to as a SUID (Session User Identifier), that identifies the DDL node, and a DDL port which identifies a particular input/output port of that DDL node.

Physical Layer--

The lowest layer handles timing of transmissions and preparing the data for modulating into RF energy radiated by a transmitter and intercepted and processed by multiple receivers.

Arbiter

Referring to FIG. 1, each DDL network session 15 is coordinated by one of the DDL nodes 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500, operating in the role of "arbiter." This arbiter node is usually onboard an aircraft UAV1 or UAV2 to benefit from the advantaged position up in the air. In various other network environments (not shown), for example in a totally ground based network environment, the arbiter may be in a node that is advantageously positioned to, capable of, or particularly effective at communicating with the other nodes. Or, it may be in a node in secure location, if desired. In FIG. 1, DDL node 100 in UAV1 is illustrated in the role of arbiter. The primary duty of the arbiter is to schedule time slots during which each node is allowed to transmit. Sharing of a communications channel by time scheduling is known as "Time Division Multiple Access" (TDMA).

The arbiter 100 controls the bandwidth for each of the client nodes 200, 300, 400, and 500. The arbiter 100 sets the bandwidth for each node 200, 300, 400, and 500. If the bandwidth allocated by the arbiter 100 is not required by any of the nodes 200, 300, 400, and 500, the arbiter gives the bandwidth to another of the nodes 200, 300, 400, or 500. The arbiter moves the bandwidth allocation around. This allows the arbiter 100 to allocate to one node a large bandwidth, and to another node a small bandwidth, based on the needs of each of the nodes 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500. Thus, the arbiter 100 controls all communication in the network session 15.

Further, all communication is between a DDL node 200, 300, 400, or 500, and the arbiter 100. Generally the arbiter 100 is in an airplane, but anyone of the nodes 200, 300, 400, or 500 could be the arbiter. The arbiter 100 could be on the ground, but generally it is placed in an aircraft because an aircraft has the best line of sight for transmitting wireless signals. As shown in FIG. 1, a node 300 in another airplane UAV2 may relay through the arbiter 100 in airplane UAV1 to the other nodes 200, 400, or 500. In this embodiment, in addition to being the arbiter, DDL node 100 may also have its own session video, vehicle control data, or other data to communicate. Thus, the DDL node 100 also participates in the allocation of bandwidth at the arbiter 100.

In conventional TDMA applications, a predetermined cycle is used. In various embodiments of the present application, the arbiter 100 can set up a regular cycle for transmission, but it is able to vary bandwidth allocated to each node 200, 300, 400, or 500 based on the session 15 bandwidth needs. The arbiter 100 is not locked into a predetermined cycle. The bandwidth for each node 200, 300, 400, or 500 can change from burst to burst. The decision making on how to allocate bandwidth is by the arbiter 100. If there is low bandwidth data, such as only voice data, the arbiter could set up a more structured network analogous to a TDMA. If the data requirements change the arbiter 100 can change bandwidth allocation. For example, sometimes the arbiter 100 may require high bandwidth to send a whole new full frame of new video to a ground station GCU1, or and thereafter it may just need to send low bandwidth incremental video to the ground station GCU1. As the amount of data changes, the arbiter 100 can vary the allocation to each node 200, 300, 400 and 500. The arbiter 100 can be reactive to the data transmission needs within the session 15.

Node Addressing

FIGS. 3A and 3B show block diagrams of node addressing for a sample DDL session 16, from the perspective of LAPTOP1 connected to ground control station GCU1. FIG. 3A shows a block diagram of illustrating the Random Unit Identifiers (RUID) and the specific input/output channels or ports of the DDL nodes 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500. For communication between the DDL nodes 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500, the Random Unit Identifiers (RUID) (sometimes alternatively referred to as Session User Identifiers (SUID)) and the specific input/output channels are designated by DDL port numbers: 01 for DDL Control, 11 for Ethernet, 21 for Serial communications, 31 for LVDS or Low Voltage Differential Signals, and 02 for the Arbiter are used.

For communication, the ground control station DDL node to which a laptop is connected maps known DDL nodes into IP port number ranges to allow software on the laptop to address the DDL nodes using conventional IP address and port number pairs. FIG. 3B shows a block diagram illustrating an example of mapping of know network nodes 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 within a network session 16 by the ground control station DDL node 200. LAPTOP1 210 is connected, into IP port number ranges for use by LAPTOP1 210. This allows software on the LAPTOP1 210 to address the DDL nodes using conventional IP address and port number pairs. The conventional IP address (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) and the base port addresses are generated by the GCL1 DDL node 200 to provide to the LAPTOP1 210. The DDL Network Table 202 show and example of the conventional IP addresses (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) with the base port addresses, i.e. 5000, 50100, 5200, 5300, and 50400, that are assigned by the GCL1 DDL node 200 to provide to the LAPTOP1 210 for the session 16. The DDL node 200 uses the RUID addresses and port numbers shown in FIG. 3A to communicate with the other DDL nodes 100, 300, 400, and 500.

Referring to FIG. 3A, the Arbiter 101 and the UAV1 systems 102 have separate RUID addresses, 0 and 47034, respectively, in this example. Thus, the Arbiter 101 and the UAV systems 102 are assigned distinct base ports 50000 and 50100.

Note that in the example of FIG. 3B, DDL node 500 is a passive listener so is note addressable by LAPTOP1 210, so does not appear in the DDL Network Table 201. In other embodiments, RTV 500 may be addressable. Similarly, LAPTOP2 410 is not addressable in this example, but may be in other embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, RTV 500, or LAPTOP2 410 may be addressable to communicate text or other messages.

Referring to FIG. 3B, each DDL node that has a laptop attached generates its own DDL Network Table (not show) for its respective laptop. As such, a different DDL Network Table (not shown) would be generated by the GCU2 DDL node 400 for laptop 410.

Messages and Packets

DDL Messages convey commands between DDL nodes. Bandwidth allocation strategies govern how DDL nodes share the RF channel to communicate with other DDL nodes, and support connections to and between external devices. Communication between DDL nodes is conveyed in a small set of packets with specific header information and message content. DDL nodes communicate with each other via messages described in Table 2. Note that data from an external device is carried in one of these messages.

Referring to FIG. 1, in various implementations, each node 200, 300, 400, and 500 requests from the arbiter 100 the amount of bandwidth it needs. As shown below in Table 2, the nodes 200, 300, 400, and 500 request a desired amount of bandwidth that it would like or Desired BW, and also a minimum amount of bandwidth that it requires or Required BW. Further, in various embodiments, the nodes 200, 300, 400, and 500 may request a service interval, the longest time to wait before sending more data using Slot start and Slot duration, and request a preferred allocation size or Allocated BW, because some data may have an inherent size associated with it. Based on these requests, the arbiter 100 controls the bandwidth with each of the nodes 200, 300, 400, and 500.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 DDL Messages Exported Destina- to Meaning Source tion Parameters Ethernet Request BW Client Arbiter RUID no Type (1 = GCU, 2 = A/C, 3 = External) Name (32 characters) Required BW (Kb/sec) Desired BW (Kb/sec) Slot Allocation Arbiter All RUID no Allocated BW (Kb/s) Slot start (usec after cycle sync) Slot duration (usec) Data Client All various video, TM, yes or external data Control Client Client various autopilot no commands Limit BW Client Client Limit BW(Kb/sec) no Above message commands that client to adjust its requested BW, to accommodate other clients. Assume Arbiter Client Client no Release Arbiter Client Arbiter no Publish Arbiter Arbiter All no Change Channel Client Client New channel number no or New band number All Timeout (msec)

The messages of Table 2 are transmitted as DDL packets, which also include the fields described in Table 3 below. DDL Messages include the fields shown in Table 3 to assist the receiver.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 DDL Message Control Fields Parameter Explanation Message Type Selects from the set of defined messages. Sequence Counter Incremented by 1 for each message generated by a node. This reveals if messages arrive out of order, or are lost. Time to Live Number of relay hops remaining. Zero means done.

Example Scenarios and Messages

One Aircraft and One GCS

FIGS. 4A and 4B

FIGS. 4A and 4B show a block diagram showing transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over a mission lifetime for one aircraft being controlled by one GCU. In this example communications in a simple mission scenario 600 where an operator powers up one UAV and one GCU, preflights the aircraft, launches and flies it to the area of interest, observes those areas, flies back home, and lands.

In this scenario 600, the aircraft listens to determine if there is a session in progress at block 610, and upon hearing no existing session in progress, initiates its own session by taking on the role of arbiter for this channel, in this geographic area of reception. The arbiter session is ready to accept any UAVs and GCUs which might check in, at any time. The arbiter will allocate in frame 620 (Frame No. 1), the maximum bandwidth to block 624 for the UAV downlink video stream. This is because initially, the only other demands on the channel are relatively low: flight commands uplink from the GCU 1 to the aircraft, and contention slots 625 allocated by the arbiter for new nodes to check in and request bandwidth.

The GCU 1 hears the arbiter, and in frame 630 (Frame M), joins the session to obtain a bandwidth allocation. In frame 630 (Frame M), the GCU1 issues a request 636 in contention slot 635 and takes control of the UAV in frame 640 (Frame M+1), which it will retain for the duration of the mission.

The request 636 by the GCU1 is granted slot 646 in frame 640 (Frame M+1) and the GCU1 issues a command 647 in contention slot 645. The command 647 is granted slot 657 in frame 650 (Frame M+2). The GCU1 issues a command 648 in contention slot 655. The GCU1 transmits the command data 657 but does not need the entire slot 657 so the arbiter ends frame 650 at 650e and starts the next frame 660 (Frame M+3), where the command 658 is granted slot 667. The arbiter offers contention slot 665 for new requesters.

The RVTs which tune to this channel and which have the correct encryption key for this session can view the video transmitted down from the UAV 1.

Video Relay: Two Aircraft and One GCS

FIGS. 5A and 5B

FIGS. 5A and 5B is a block diagram illustrating transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over a mission lifetime for an example video relay scenario 700. In this example, an operator uses one UAV1 as a "relay" to communicate with a second remote "sensor" UAV2. The sensor UAV2 cannot communicate with the GCU1 directly because it is either beyond radio range of the GCU1, or not in line-of-sight of the GCU1. The operator first powers up the GCU1 and the relay UAV1, and flies it to a relay station from which it can communicate with both the GCU1 and with the sensor UAV2 when it arrives in its planned area of operation. The operator then powers up the sensor UAV2, flies it to its area of operation, and operates it. Upon completion of the mission, the sensor UAV2 is recovered first, followed by the relay UAV1. Extended relay mission durations can be achieved by relieving the relay UAV1 when it approaches battery exhaustion: this is described below in the Relay Relief scenario FIGS. 6A and 6B.

Upon first powering up, the relay UAV2 hears no existing session in progress and initiates its own session by taking on the role of arbiter for this channel, within this geographic area of reception. The arbiter session is ready to accept additional UAVs and additional GCUs that might check in at any time. Shown in frame 710 (Frame M), GCU1 is controlling UAV1, while UAV1 is transmitting high bandwidth video in slot 714. The arbiter will initially allocate maximum bandwidth to video slot 714 to the downlink video stream from its own UAV1, since the only other demands on the channel are the flight command 716 uplink from the GCU1 to the UAV1 and contention slot 725 opportunities allocated by the arbiter for new nodes to check in and request bandwidth, shown in frame 720 (Frame M+1). This allocation continues while the relay UAV1 is flown to its relay station.

When the relay UAV1 is airborne, the operator can power up the sensor UAV2, preflight it, launch it, and fly it out to its area of operations. Upon powering up, the sensor UAV2 hears the existing session conducted by the relay UAV1, and checks in with a request 726 for high bandwidth to support its video stream. In this example, in frame 720 (Frame M+1), the arbiter invites new requests in slot 725 and UAV2 request moderate bandwidth video 726, but it exceeds capacity. Having previously granted maximum bandwidth to the relay UAV1 video at 724, the arbiter must now adjust the bandwidth allocations to satisfy the sensor UAV2 request. The arbiter adjusts the bandwidth allocations based on the bandwidth policy in effect at that time, typically reducing the allocation of current streams and granting an allocation to the sensor UAV2. The allocation for the sensor UAV2 video stream will be set cognizant of the need for the relay UAV1 to receive the sensor UAV1 stream and retransmit it.

In frame 730 (Frame M+2), GCU1 controls UAV2 and sends pilot commands in slot 737. In frame 740 (Frame M+3), UAV2 transmits telemetry and very low bandwidth video in slots 748 and 749, respectively. In frame 750 (M+4), GCU1 commands UAV1 to reduce to minimum bandwidth in slot 757. In frame 760 (Frame M+5), UAV2 transmits telemetry and moderate bandwidth video in slot 768 and 769, respectively. In frame 770 (Frame M+6), UAV2 transmits telemetry 778 and video 779 but does not need entire slot 775 so the frame 770 (Frame M+6) ends at 770e. The arbiter starts the next frame 780 (Frame M+7) early. In frame 780 (Frame M+7), GCU1 sends pilot commands in slot 787 to UAV2. In frame 790 (Frame M+8), UAV2 transmits telemetry and moderate bandwidth video in slots 798 and 799, respectively.

The arbiter controls the session, thus, the arbiter grants GCU1 bandwidth in frame 710. The arbiter invites new requests in frame 720. In frame 730, the arbiter grants GCU1 bandwidth. In frame 740, the arbiter grants UAV2 available bandwidth. At frame 750, the arbiter grants GCU1 bandwidth. The arbiter grants UAV2 moderate bandwidth in frames 760 and 770. Then, at frame 780, the arbiter grants the GCU1 bandwidth. Thereafter, the arbiter again grants UAV2 moderate bandwidth at frame 790.

RVTs which tune to this channel and have the correct encryption key for this session can view the video transmitted down from the Relay aircraft.

Relay Relief: 2 Aircraft/2 GCS

FIGS. 6A and 6B

FIGS. 6A and 6B is a block diagram illustrating transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over a portion of a mission for an example video relay scenario 800. In this example, transmit slot allocations of arbiter cycles over the portion of mission when a new aircraft UAV2 relieves a relay aircraft UAV1. An operator is using one aircraft as a "Relay" to communicate with other aircraft or GCUs, and that Relay aircraft reaches its limit of endurance. The operator powers up the relief UAV2 and flies it to the relay station, where it downloads the session information from the relay UAV1, and assumes the duties of arbiter.

In frame 810 (Frame M), the arbiter grants GCU1 bandwidth in slot 816 and GCU1 forwards data at 816 from its external client to GCU2 for its external client. In frame 820 (Frame M+1), the arbiter grants GCU2 bandwidth in slot 826. GCU2 is forwarding data 826 from it external client to GCU1 for its external client. In frame 830 (Frame M+2), the arbiter invites new requests, so UAV2 having turned on and detected the session in progress, UAV2 waits for a contention slot 835 and then requests in slot 836, bandwidth for transmitting its telemetry. In frame 840 (Frame M+3), the arbiter grants UAV2 bandwidth and UAV2 transmits its telemetry in slot 846.

Prior to frame 850 (Frame N), UAV2 launches and climbs to station. At frame 850 (Frame N), the arbiter grants GCU1 bandwidth and GCU1 commands UAV2 to assume arbiter at 856. In frame 860 (Frame N+1), the arbiter in UAV1 grants UAV2 bandwidth and UAV2 requests the arbiter in UAV1 to relinquish the role of session arbiter at 866. In frame 870 (Frame N+2) there is no grant of allocation slots by the arbiter in UAV1 as the arbiter in UAV1 transmits its arbiter table in slot 876 to allow UAV2 to assume the role of arbiter without forcing clients to check-in again. In frame 880 (Frame N+3), UAV2 has assumed the role of arbiter and grants GCU2 bandwidth and GCU2 forwards data at 896 from its external client to GCU1 for its external client. At frame 890 (Frame N+4), the arbiter in UAV2 grants GCU1 bandwidth and GCU1 forwards data at 896 from its external client to GCU2, for it external client.

It is worthy to note that any reference to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in an embodiment, if desired. The appearances of the phrase "in one embodiment" in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.

The illustrations and examples provided herein are for explanatory purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims. This disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the spirit and scope of the invention and/or claims of the embodiment illustrated.

Those skilled in the art will make modifications to the invention for particular applications of the invention.

The discussion included in this patent is intended to serve as a basic description. The reader should be aware that the specific discussion may not explicitly describe all embodiments possible and alternatives are implicit. Also, this discussion may not fully explain the generic nature of the invention and may not explicitly show how each feature or element can actually be representative or equivalent elements. Again, these are implicitly included in this disclosure. Where the invention is described in device-oriented terminology, each element of the device implicitly performs a function. It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the invention. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. These changes still fall within the scope of this invention.

Further, each of the various elements of the invention and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. This disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of any apparatus embodiment, a method embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these. Particularly, it should be understood that as the disclosure relates to elements of the invention, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms even if only the function or result is the same. Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled. It should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action. Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action which that physical element facilitates. Such changes and alternative terms are to be understood to be explicitly included in the description.

Having described this invention in connection with a number of embodiments, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art. The example embodiments herein are not intended to be limiting, various configurations and combinations of features are possible. As such, the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as required by the appended claims.

* * * * *